
Courtesy of Margaret Wille
By Margaret Wille
BOTTOM LINE: The Redistricting Commission rejected Plan A and adopted Plan B. With the help of community members around the Island, I drafted the original version of Plan B (Plan 40).
For those who have not been following this island wide drama here is a little background: Plan A would have shifted the County Council (legislative) Districts clockwise. As a result of that proposed shift, District 1 would have been cut in half with the southern portion of the Hamakua coast lumped into an urban/suburban South Hilo District (for practical purposes this would give urban South Hilo an extra council seat at the expense of Hamakua – and eliminate the Hamakua council seat). Plan A would have also pushed Honokaa into District 9 to be lumped with Waimea, North Kohala, and Kawaihae-Puako, and likewise bump Waikoloa out of District 9 into a Kona dominated District 8.
On the other hand, Plan B, on a regional basis, preserved the overall general orientation of the current county council districts – adding in a more mauka makai alignment where possible.
For some residing in the Puna area, the problem Plan B was that Volcano remained in District 5 and some folks wanted it shift into Puna District 5. (There were also some who felt Volcano was more appropriate in District 6, and who said if shifted to District 5, Volcano would control politics in District 5. These folks also pointed out that given the population limitations, that if Volcano were included in District 5, then upper Puna would be pushed back into Hilo District 3)
UPDATE – THE NOVEMBER 10, 2011 COMMISSION MEETING: Chairperson Rene Siracusa requested that the Commissioners first again consider Plan A – with the objective of attempting again to shift Volcano from District 6 into District 5 while at the same time not making a mess of the other Districts. This attempt was unsuccessful.
Councilperson Linda Ugalde from Volcano, the Commissioner appointed to represent District 6, argued strenuously to shift Volcano to District 5. However by midday, she conceded that this relocation of Volcano was not possible – without causing a negative domino effect around the island. At that point she said she would accept that Volcano must remain in District 6, but wanted to make sure all of greater Volcano should stay together – including Volcano Village on both sides of Route 11 up to, but not including Fern Acres. The other Commissioners all expressed appreciation to Commissioner Ugalde for this concession made in the interest of the island as a whole.
Another area of particular concern has eastend Waimea . The current district 9/1 line is at White Road and Mana Road area. The update of Plan B that worked on would have kept that district boundary at White Road and a bit further East along portions of Mana Road – but not as far as Lakeland. At the November 10th hearing Bill Sanborn and a few other Waimea residents testified that East Waimea/Lakeland residents were not being adequately represented. Based on his and other similar testimony, Commissioner Poindexter (District 1 rep) successfully argued to move the District 1 line closer to Waimea-town – reasoning that this would increase the clout of Lakeland and East Waimea generally in District 1.
At the November 10th hearing, one of the most interesting debates was between Commissioner Jeff Melrose (District 2 rep) and Commissioner Mike Middlesworth (District 3 rep). Commissioner Middlesworth had submitted a plan revising Plan B so that that District 3 preserved its more rural orientation, with District 2 a “downtown” Hilo District. On the other hand, Commissioner Jeff Melrose argued in favor of keeping the mauka- makai orientation of both Districts 2 and 3, so that each would have an “urban” component and a mauka “rural” component. Commissioner Middlesworth expressed the concern that this would undermine the rural orientation of District 3. The Commission’s draft final plan is oriented as advocated by Commissioner Melrose – both South Hilo Districts containing an urban and a rural area.
With respect to Kona area, Commissioners Craig “Bo” Kahui (District 8 rep) and Dru Kanuha (District 7 rep) said they could work the boundary between their two “Kona” Districts. Commissioner Kahui also made a point of saying that keeping Puako and Waikoloa in District 9 is appropriate (rather than in Kona District 8).
So now we have the draft final plan… which will go to public hearing on November 21 (Kona) and November 22 (Hilo) – so that although the big question of the general orientation of the Plan has been fixed, any alternative modifications of the individual boundary lines can be addressed.
One question I have is in which District should Mauna Kea – top of mountain be located: Hamakua District 1 (where it is now), Kona District 8; or Hilo District 2 (where it is on the draft final plan. What do you think? This question would not affect any
AN ASIDE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THE NUANCES OF THIS PROCEEDING — CURIOUSLY: Following the November 3rd Commission meeting, I worked on an alternative to Plan B with the goal of addressing several concerns expressed by Commissioner Patrick Kahawaiolaa and Rene Siracusa (concerning the boundaries between Districts 2/3, 3/4 , and 4/5). I submitted testimony to the Commission showing two different updated alternative configurations to Plan B both of which contained the revisions I had included to address the concerns expressed by these two Commissioners. A few days later I met with District 9 Representative Joe Carvalho and he discussed my updated revision (Plan B alternative 1) and explained that Commissioner Middlesworth and further revised that Plan B alternative 1 (which was called Plan B alt 1.1). Joe indicated he was supportive of this revision Plan B alt 1.1. This revised Plan B is available on the restricting site – at the link with the yellow file icon that is labeled “OPEN”. Now what I found curious is that at the November 10th Commission meeting that Plan B alt 1.1 was never mentioned.
For those at the Kona council office who were watching the November 10th Commission proceeding that this alternative draft worked on by two of the Commissioners was particularly strange. Cheryl King from Kona had brought copies of that plan with her to the meeting. When the Commissioners began working off the 11-1 draft of Plan B, seeking to make the same revisions that had already been accomplished in this updated version, Commission Bo Kahui inquired of the other Commissioners about this revised version, Plan B alternative 1.1, but there was no response from the other Commissioners.
Strange … almost as if some superior force had deleted Plan B alt 1.1 from the minds of the Commissioners familiar with this revision.
For those who have emailed me inquiring about the Puna area boundaries on the Commission’s final draft (PLAN B DATED 11/10/11) I attach some screen shots.
[INSERT SCREEN SHOTS except for the Commission’s draft final plan]
For those who are interested, here is a screenshot of that Plan B alt 1.1 draft (note the different layout of Districts 2 and 3 (a more urban versus rural alignment). Also note the more upper versus lower Puna orientation of Districts 4 and 5.

[PLAN B alternative 1.1]
(Margaret Wille is a lawyer and blogger who lives in Waimea. Her commentary has been republished here with permission.)