Letters — From Sen. Russell Ruderman, Expressing Concern For Puna Elections

To the Editor,

I wish to express my concern for the people of Puna and my dismay at the seemingly dismissive attitude displayed by election officials concerning the primary elections in the Puna District.

Due to the damage caused by Hurricane Iselle on Friday, August 8, election officials made the decision to close two polling stations in the Puna district: Keonepoko Elementary School and at the Hawaiian Paradise Park Community Center. The decision was logical at the time, given that major roads to these polling stations were inaccessible due to fallen trees and electrical poles.

Unfortunately, however, there appear to be systemic, troubling failures in how this and subsequent decisions were carried out. Residents who were able to reach these two polling stations despite the hazards were turned away and told that ballots would be mailed to them. This was initially a good plan, and allowed for the voters to address their immediate needs due to Hurricane Iselle. In the aftermath, election officials changed their minds and decided, without consideration of conditions on the ground (many residents are still without power, water, or internet) to instead require walk-in voting this Friday, August 15. I am greatly concerned that the Election Office’s plan to mail notices and post signs on the sides of highways will not suffice due to number of residents that are still trapped and without communications.

I personally tried to contact Mr. Scott Nago, Chief Elections Officer, and to notify the offices of the actual candidates numerous times during the weekend to get some kind of update on what was happening on the ground, in the district. My calls went unanswered until late Monday when Mr. Nago contacted me AFTER a decision had already been made. Even during our conversation, Mr. Nago still failed to notify me of that decision. This is extremely troubling and unfortunate.

Furthermore, many residents were assigned polling stations that remained opened; however, they could not reach them. These residents are not being offered an alternative means at all to cast a ballot. This is unacceptable, especially in light an analysis of Election Day precinct turnout showing an 11.5 percent turnout at Keaau High School, a 12 percent turnout at Pahoa Community Center and a 12.3 percent turnout at Pahoa High and Intermediate School. Mountain View Elementary School had a 14.3 percent turnout and an overall statewide turnout of 41.4% according to data compiled by the state Office of Elections clearly illustrates that turnout was badly affected.

These low numbers are in sharp contrast to the much higher turnout in the previous two elections, and indicate to me that many people who would normally have voted, could not because of the storm. These are my constituents, whom I know to be astute, active, and vocal when it comes to the political process. They are now being effectively disenfranchised by the unwillingness of election officials to take them into account. This is one more example of the unfairness of someone in Honolulu making a decision that unnecessarily punishes the people on a neighbor island without knowing, or seemingly caring, what the real conditions are on the ground.

Hawaii Law requires that the voting process to be complete 21 days after the primary election. My question is, why was a decision so hastily made to designate Friday the 15th as the day for elections for the two affected areas, when so many residents along Red Road, in Pohoiki, and other areas of Puna are still trapped by fallen trees? Not only is it is physically impossible for these voters to get to a polling station (and there is no plan to extend voting for hundreds of people in this situation), but the majority of these voters aren’t even aware that the decision has been made to reschedule the election in the first place.

The Governor, under Hawaii Revised Statutes 128-9(60 (6) Election hours, has the authority to adjust the hours for voting to take into consideration the needs of the citizens during such emergencies.

Hawaii Revised Statutes 128-9(60 (6) Election hours. To adjust the working hours of the voters during the national emergency and other emergency conditions, and for the purpose to suspend those provisions of section 11-131 which fix the hours for voting, and fix other hours by stating the same in the election proclamation or notice, as the case may be.

It is imperative that allowances be made to address the concerns and rights of eligible voters to be allowed to participate in our elections process. We still have the time and resources necessary to make amends and avoid the inevitable lawsuits that will be forthcoming should the decision to hold the voting on Friday stand. It is incumbent on officials to take the necessary actions to guarantee that all are afforded their Constitutional rights under law to that participation.


Senator Russell E. Ruderman
Hawaii State Senate – 2nd District

8 replies
  1. Steven Offenbaker
    Steven Offenbaker says:

    Scott Nago should have been terminated in 2012 when he didn’t have enough ballots for the election, he’s no better now.

  2. Steven Offenbaker
    Steven Offenbaker says:

    Additionally all of this election trouble could have been avoided if the Governor had done the right thing and postponed the election a week in the first place.

  3. James Weatherford
    James Weatherford says:

    The clue to how clueless are the folks in the Ivory Tower in Honolulu is that they are “mailing” notices to residents of the 2 precincts.
    Almost zero of those residents get mail delivered to their home — even when the road is not blocked.
    It is miles to their P.O. Boxes.
    Minimum 2 or 3 days for mail to go from Oahu to Pahoa — even in the best of circumstances.
    Drive twenty miles or more round trip daily to check mail (even when the road is not blocked) ?

    Those “notices” leave Honolulu on Tuesday 8/12.
    They arrive Pahoa P.O. no earlier than Thursday 8/14.
    Yeah, right.

  4. Bruce Albrecht
    Bruce Albrecht says:

    Beyond the voter disenfranchisement, I think any candidate who’s outcome is influenced by these 2 precincts has a fairly strong case to challenge the results. To announce results before all ballots are cast demonstrates a blatant disregard for the election process. Besides those who will not vote due to lack of access–or simply have more pressing matters to attend to like food, water and shelter–I believe there will be many voters who feel the elections are decided.
    The whole thing stinks, and I hope that Hawaii voters remember this incident when they get the legal bill for defending the Office of Elections policies in court.

  5. Russell Ruderman
    Russell Ruderman says:

    Thank you Mr. Ha! How nice to hear this agreement. I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day (That’s me, the clock). Next time spell my name right; I’m a ‘ruderman’ than most. Just kidding – anytime you agree with me you can spell my name any way you want!
    By the way, I made an error in the figures, tho the resulting conclusion is not changed. 12% turnout in Puna should have been compared to 20% statewide for election day voting, not 40% which included early voting.
    Still this is a 40% reduction in turnout, showing the effects of the storm on turnout.

  6. Richard Ha
    Richard Ha says:

    Aloha Senator
    I am very sorry I have been spelling your name wrong. I won’t do it again. You have a great sense of humor.
    I know that we both want what is best for the people.
    And, we are not so far apart that we cannot try to find common ground. I hope you and your Ohana are ok after this storm.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *